|
A demographic imperative
Simon Williams, HSBC MENA Chief
Economist argues for systemic structural reforms in the Middle
East to face the demographic and growth challenges of the future
in a freewheeling chat with Mayank Singh

Dr What has the impact of the Eurozone crisis been on the
MENA region?
The impact of the Eurozone crisis has been limited on the MENA
region. We have had our own difficulties in 2011 like the
political unrest during the first months of the year and this
had a major bearing on the private sector’s confidence. Overall,
the sentiment is getting more risk averse, so when the Eurozone
crisis came about we were already coming off a muted base. When
I compare the Eurozone crisis of 2008 and 2011, I am more
confident this time around, because the region feels less
vulnerable. There were a lot of bubbles in 2008, but now there
are few excesses and that gives me a lot of confidence;
governments understand the necessity of spending aggressively
where they can in the changed environment and that is a healthy
sign. Nonetheless, the slowdown in the West is having an impact
as they are our trade partners; the demand for oil and non oil
goods has weakened and I am particularly concerned about access
to capital, because we depend upon international capital,
whether it is from the international bond market, loan market or
funding from European banks, and such funding is going to get
more difficult and costly in future.
You spoke about the higher cost of funding in the wake of the
Eurozone crisis. Have interest rates started moving up?
Not really. Policy rates are almost zero, though I do not think
that anyone can borrow at zero interest rates. There is a degree
of risk aversion running across the banking sector. In Oman the
banking sector has performed reasonably well and there has been
some growth in the volume of credit; the same is true for Saudi
Arabia and Qatar. I am more anxious about places like the UAE,
where there has always been a higher dependence on foreign
funding in the banking sector. This comes on the back of a
scenario where liquidity looks stretched and rates are under
pressure and this may rise further in 2012.
The global economic slowdown predicates the fact that the
demand for oil may go down in these parts of the world. Is that
a real threat or will the enhanced demand from emerging
countries offset that threat?
When I look around I am a bit confused as to why the prices of
every other commodity such as copper, food etc have fallen but
oil prices have remained rock solid at $105-$110 per barrel. I
can see these prices weakening in 2012. If oil prices have
remained high despite Europe and the US being in trouble, it
makes it abundantly clear that it’s Asia and the emerging
markets that have kept energy prices high.
What has been the economic fallout of the events that have
taken place in the MENA region?
The impact varies in different parts of the region. In Egypt and
Libya the consequences have been severe and we are quite some
way from a return to normal economic activity. In the GCC the
impact has been less marked because the unrest has been
contained, institutions have held up better, but even here the
private sector has looked nervous. International investors that
are not committed to the region have been deterred by the
problems that they have seen elsewhere. My real worry is the
impact of the unrest in deterring governments from economic
reforms; there is much less appetite for economic change now
than what I saw five or 10 years ago. The decision to increase
public spending and salaries run contrary to the goal of
increasing the national participation of the private sector,
encouraging diversification and that troubles me. This is
particularly disturbing because the experience of the last one
year shows that the economic models being practiced in the
region are simply not delivering the growth, employment
opportunities or welfare to meet the demographic pressures that
the region faces. The case for economic change is much more
stronger than it has ever been.
If you were to do a country wise analysis where do you they
stand in terms of economic challenges? Are countries in the GCC
region not in the same boat as the other in the MENA region?
The wealth at their disposal makes it easier for countries in
the GCC to keep their economic models going on for longer, but
even in the GCC smaller oil producers like Oman and Bahrain
there are strains that are showing. There is strong unemployment
despite a good run of three digit oil prices, which clearly
shows that there is something that is clearly not working.
What are the changes in economic policy that you would like
to see in these countries?
I have a long shopping list of changes to recommend. There needs
to be capital market reforms across the region as there is an
over dependence on banking credit. Our equity markets are
limited and there is no credit market, there is no domestic debt
market and we have a very limited dollar market. So when bank
credit is difficult to get as now, then it is very difficult for
the private sector to access funding. In many cases we have the
laws that are needed but transparency is very limited;
confidence in the legal and judicial system (not here in Oman)
across the region is limited and there are concerns around
implementation, adherence and transparency issues. In the labour
market there is talk about developing the private sector as a
source of employment, about nationalising the work forces; but
then we increase public sector salaries dramatically, making it
difficult for the private sector to attract people and creating
a disincentive for nationals to acquire the skills that they
need to work successfully in the private sector. We say we want
to encourage entrepreneurialism but then we make it a criminal
offence to go bankrupt. If you bounce a cheque and go to jail
then you may not go out and take the kind of risks as you may in
the US or Europe, because the consequences are too severe. In
fiscal reforms we are reliant on oil revenues, and we need to
diversify from oil revenues to encourage more stable public
finances and probably we need to introduce more accountable
public spending. Our monetary policy is tied to the US. The US
is broken, but we are letting Washington set interest rates and
the list goes on, but none of these issues are new and policy
makers are aware of this, but the experience of the past year
makes it imperative to focus on these areas of structural
reforms.
You believe that the economic structures created in the 1970s
are not capable of taking on the challenges of the 21st century.
This is quite a admonition, what makes you so critical of these
institutions and structures?
The growth in the GCC in the last 10 years has averaged 4-4.5
per cent even though the price of our core commodity – oil has
increased five-fold. The region has been the biggest beneficiary
of the revaluation of commodities but our growth rates are
running 2.5 per cent below emerging markets average. Why is this
so? Why do we have substantial youth employment? Big commodity
states which should have been beneficiaries of high oil prices
and their failure to generate rapid economic growth clearly
reflects a need for structural changes in economic structures of
the past.
Can you do some crystal gazing on 2012 and what it holds in
store for the region and businesses?
My growth rates for most of the region hover between 3.5-4.5 per
cent. That is a good number, if one were sitting in the US or UK
one would be delighted by these statistics, but this is below
potential for the GCC as a whole including Oman. These economies
are six to seven percentage growth stories and there is massive
catch up growth potential that needs to be realised. My big
worry is that the primary driver of growth continues to be
public sector spending and the private sectors activity is far
more muted.
|